I'm Paul Bissex, and e-scribe.com is my consulting business. I build web applications using open source software, especially Django. In the '90s I did graphic design for newspapers and magazines. Then I wrote technology commentary and reviews for Wired, Salon.com, Chicago Tribune, and lots of little places you've never heard of. Feel free to email me.
I'm co-author of "Python Web Development with Django", an excellent guide to my favorite web framework. Published by Addison-Wesley, it is available from Amazon and your favorite technical bookstore as well.
Built using Django, served by Apache and mod_wsgi. The database is SQLite. The operating system is FreeBSD, on a VPS hosted at Johncompanies.com. Comment-spam protection by Akismet. Vintage topo imagery from the Maptech archive. The markup engine is Markdown.
Akismet, bitbucket, del.icio.us, Django, Emacs, FreeBSD, Git, jQuery, LaunchBar, Markdown, Mercurial, OS X, Postfix, Python, Review Board, S3, SQLite, TextMate, Ubuntu Linux
At least 96060 pieces of comment spam killed since January 2008, mostly via Akismet.
Dear Webmaster:
When I click on an offsite link from section508.gov, I get a Javascript alert warning me that I'm "leaving" the site and that "We welcome your comments on how we can make this site more useful."
Here's my comment: Ditch the Javascript alerts. It would make the site more useful for me. Really -- if I explore half a dozen offsite links (opened in tabs in the background for later browsing) I have to dismiss half a dozen JS alerts. I can't imagine the situation is any better, or more useful, for somebody using a screenreader.
Anyway, I sent this email on the presumption that the actual webmaster (you) thinks those alerts are stupid but is forced to put them in there because of some PHB who got the implementation idea from his nephew (nephews love Javascript alerts). You can tell your boss that you've been getting a lot of e-mail from influential web professionals who think the alerts reduce the credibility of the section508.gov site.
Man, I sure hope they weren't your idea!
Sincerely,
Paul Bissex
You are fighting a losing battle here.
Some bureaucrat, or worse committee of bureaucrats, has established this behaviour as a standard for US government websites. Apparently they think that the American people are too stupid to be able to tell one web site from another and don't want to be blamed for any errors on some site that they link to.
The scary thing to me is that they may be right.
By the way, you have a very nicely designed site.
Thanks for reading! Please note: Your comment will not appear until approved, which may take a few hours or more. Spammers will be torpedoed.
Booktools
2 comments
A different kind of URL shortener
4 comments
The syncbox
2 comments
Branching and merging in real life
8 comments
Summer Spam
1 comment
malpaso
Understanding tuples vs. lists in Python
13 days ago
vj100
Understanding tuples vs. lists in Python
13 days ago
scott
Bicycle Repair Man bundle for TextMate
19 days ago
Jasmine
Trying to send eBay a message?
56 days ago
Smok Cigs
Let's play a game: BASIC vs. Ruby vs. Python vs. PHP
93 days ago
Copyright 2012
by Paul Bissex
and E-Scribe New Media
I think there is a law/guideline that says .gov web sites have to notify users that they are leaving the original site. I'll try to find out for sure on Monday. There are many .gov web sites that do this. I'm not saying it's effective, but unfortunately it is fairly common. Mike