I'm Paul Bissex, and e-scribe.com is my consulting business. I build web applications using open source software, especially Django. In the '90s I did graphic design for newspapers and magazines. Then I wrote technology commentary and reviews for Wired, Salon.com, Chicago Tribune, and lots of little places you've never heard of. Feel free to email me.
I'm co-author of "Python Web Development with Django", an excellent guide to my favorite web framework. Published by Addison-Wesley, it is available from Amazon and your favorite technical bookstore as well.
Built using Django, served by Apache and mod_wsgi. The database is SQLite. The operating system is FreeBSD, on a VPS hosted at Johncompanies.com. Comment-spam protection by Akismet. Vintage topo imagery from the Maptech archive. The markup engine is Markdown.
Akismet, bitbucket, del.icio.us, Django, Emacs, FreeBSD, Git, jQuery, LaunchBar, Markdown, Mercurial, OS X, Postfix, Python, Review Board, S3, SQLite, TextMate, Ubuntu Linux
At least 95843 pieces of comment spam killed since January 2008, mostly via Akismet.
In recent weeks I've been listening to the back-catalog of Ajaxian podcasts while commuting. It's been great food for thought for me, since I'm one of those people who retreated to the server side years ago to avoid the horror of incompatible, standards-oblivious browsers and crazed animated status bar messages. Things seem to have gotten a lot better, to say the least.
Here are some things that these podcasts have prompted me to think about:
The client is getting a lot thicker. It is de rigeur for a Web 2.0 app to use prototype/script.aculo.us/dojo/mochikit in its user interface. Despite making great strides in modularity, these libraries can push page weights way up. Not everyone can switch to moo.fx. I'm wondering (in a lazyweb kind of way) whether you could write a Greasemonkey script that looked for references to these libraries and instead of loading them remotely, pulled in a local copy? Of course this would be fragile and dangerous, but Greasemonkey users live on the edge anyway. They could iron out the bugs and pave the way for a more sophisticated local caching system.
The culture around Javascript has really evolved. Five years ago it seemed to be about copying and pasting snippets, or maybe using JimBob's Javascript Library (which had functions for making crazed animated status bar messages). Now we have large-ish open source projects based around JavaScript. We have well-tested runtimes that work outside the web browser. We refer to JavaScript as a "prototype-based language" instead of "damned JavaScript."
JavaScript itself may become a sort of choke-point in the web application stack. If I'm building a web app I can choose Apache or Lighttpd, I can choose Ruby or Python or Java or PHP, I can choose Rails or Django or Seaside, I can choose Clearsilver or Smarty or Cheetah templates, I can even choose my (X)HTML dialect. But practically speaking I can't choose anything other than JavaScript for client-side control. I wonder how long it will be before we have a more advanced client-side scripting API, and what it will look like. Perhaps some kind of virtual machine, with the client-side scripts sent as bytecodes instead of text.
So, those are my big ideas. It's interesting to be thinking about the client side again. And I know, I know -- ECMAScript.
Thanks for reading! Please note: Your comment will not appear until approved, which may take a few hours or more. Spammers will be torpedoed.
Booktools
2 comments
A different kind of URL shortener
4 comments
The syncbox
2 comments
Branching and merging in real life
8 comments
Summer Spam
1 comment
malpaso
Understanding tuples vs. lists in Python
10 days ago
vj100
Understanding tuples vs. lists in Python
10 days ago
scott
Bicycle Repair Man bundle for TextMate
16 days ago
Jasmine
Trying to send eBay a message?
53 days ago
Smok Cigs
Let's play a game: BASIC vs. Ruby vs. Python vs. PHP
90 days ago
Copyright 2012
by Paul Bissex
and E-Scribe New Media