I'm Paul Bissex, and e-scribe.com is my consulting business. I build web applications using open source software, especially Django. In the '90s I did graphic design for newspapers and magazines. Then I wrote technology commentary and reviews for Wired, Salon.com, Chicago Tribune, and lots of little places you've never heard of. Feel free to email me.
I'm co-author of "Python Web Development with Django", an excellent guide to my favorite web framework. Published by Addison-Wesley, it is available from Amazon and your favorite technical bookstore as well.
Built using Django, served by Apache and mod_wsgi. The database is SQLite. The operating system is FreeBSD, on a VPS hosted at Johncompanies.com. Comment-spam protection by Akismet. Vintage topo imagery from the Maptech archive. The markup engine is Markdown.
Akismet, bitbucket, del.icio.us, Django, Emacs, FreeBSD, Git, jQuery, LaunchBar, Markdown, Mercurial, OS X, Postfix, Python, Review Board, S3, SQLite, TextMate, Ubuntu Linux
At least 96058 pieces of comment spam killed since January 2008, mostly via Akismet.
I haven't been following the SCO case very closely, having only mentioned it once since I started this blog. So I missed this ass-kicking order that came down over the summer from Judge Brooke Wells. It's long and detailed (GrokLaw speculates that this is to discourage SCO from a tedious appeal), so don't be afraid to skim for the good parts. For example:
The court finds SCOs arguments unpersuasive. SCOs arguments are akin to SCO telling IBM sorry we are not going to tell you what you did wrong because you already know. SCO received substantial code from IBM pursuant to the courts orders as mentioned supra. Further, SCO brought this action against IBM and under the Federal Rules, and the courts orders, SCO was required to disclose in detail what it feels IBM misappropriated. Given the amount of code that SCO has received in discovery the court finds it inexcusable that SCO is in essence still not placing all the details on the table. Certainly if an individual was stopped and accused of shoplifting after walking out of Neiman Marcus they would expect to be eventually told what they allegedly stole. It would be absurd for an officer to tell the accused that you know what you stole Im not telling. Or, to simply hand the accused individual a catalog of Neiman Marcus entire inventory and say its in there somewhere, you figure it out.
A bold warning to FUD perpetrators everywhere.
Thanks for reading! Please note: Your comment will not appear until approved, which may take a few hours or more. Spammers will be torpedoed.
Booktools
2 comments
A different kind of URL shortener
4 comments
The syncbox
2 comments
Branching and merging in real life
8 comments
Summer Spam
1 comment
malpaso
Understanding tuples vs. lists in Python
13 days ago
vj100
Understanding tuples vs. lists in Python
13 days ago
scott
Bicycle Repair Man bundle for TextMate
19 days ago
Jasmine
Trying to send eBay a message?
56 days ago
Smok Cigs
Let's play a game: BASIC vs. Ruby vs. Python vs. PHP
93 days ago
Copyright 2012
by Paul Bissex
and E-Scribe New Media