E-Scribe News : a programmer’s blog

About Me

PBX I'm Paul Bissex, and e-scribe.com is my consulting business. I build web applications using open source software, especially Django. In the '90s I did graphic design for newspapers and magazines. Then I wrote technology commentary and reviews for Wired, Salon.com, Chicago Tribune, and lots of little places you've never heard of. Feel free to email me.

Book

I'm co-author of "Python Web Development with Django", an excellent guide to my favorite web framework. Published by Addison-Wesley, it is available from Amazon and your favorite technical bookstore as well.

Colophon

Built using Django, served by Apache and mod_wsgi. The database is SQLite. The operating system is FreeBSD, on a VPS hosted at Johncompanies.com. Comment-spam protection by Akismet. Vintage topo imagery from the Maptech archive. The markup engine is Markdown.

Pile o'Tags

ajax apple blogs browsers business design django ebay fp fun google hardware haskell intellectual property iphone javascript linux media mercurial mobile open source os x oscon oscon2007 palm php programming python rails rants reading risks ruby site spam textmate the well tips tools unix vcs web development web frameworks webservers wmassdevs writing

Stuff I Use

Akismet, bitbucket, del.icio.us, Django, Emacs, FreeBSD, Git, jQuery, LaunchBar, Markdown, Mercurial, OS X, Postfix, Python, Review Board, S3, SQLite, TextMate, Ubuntu Linux

Spam Report

At least 96060 pieces of comment spam killed since January 2008, mostly via Akismet.

Was the old Mac a hacker's machine?

A recent discussion on the Well came around to the question of whether the classic Macintosh was "hacker's" machine or not. Conventional wisdom would say no -- it was the very definition of buttoned up. You couldn't even develop software for it without a separate, more expensive computer (the Lisa) in the early days.

But I think there's a counter-argument to be made. Yes, the old Mac was a closed box that didn't allow access to the internals of the OS. However, it was a far more tweakable system for most Mac users than the fragile, inscrutable Windows of that era was for most Windows users.

People who would never consider writing a shell script or even learning what one was were quite happy to swap INITs and CDEVs in and out of their System Folder and twiddle the way the system worked. Much more like playing with Legos than carving wooden ship models, but proportionately more accessible. In a way it was pretend hacking, but even many power users didn't know that. They just knew that they were comfortable digging into what was accessible and changing it to their liking.

Tuesday, January 16th, 2007
+ +
2 comments

Some related posts: iPod touch: holding steady • The iPhone keyboard doesn't suck • iPod touch: one week down, one week to go • A farewell to Palms (hello, iPod touch) • What is the iPhone running, really? • New MacBook Pro • Obsolescence • Apple battery recall • ExpressCard: what it is • Best feature of the new MacBook Pro
• Comment from spillz , later that day

quit with the mac revisionism, already. :)

you said it yourself, the old mac was a closed system. no self respecting hacker should be put off by fragile inscrutability (frustrated, of course, but that's the nature of hacking, right?)

• Comment from Paul , 1 day later

Guilty as charged. I hijacked the term "hacker". Sentenced to 20 years of reading Digg comments.

I'd still argue, with absolutely no data to back it up, that a higher percentage of classic Mac users felt mastery over their computing environment than did contemporaneous Windows users. As the disparities in open source project success show us, it's not just the fact of hacking but what you're hacking *on* that creates satisfaction (and thereby keeps the hacking going).

Post a comment

Thanks for reading! Please note: Your comment will not appear until approved, which may take a few hours or more. Spammers will be torpedoed.


(Will not be shared)

(Optional)